Guide to Overseas Patent Strategy: Tactics, Costs, and Risk Mitigation
Overseas patent strategy is a core safeguard for companies expanding globally. A well-planned strategy helps build technical barriers in target markets. This guide outlines strategic planning, cost structure, phased execution, and insurance tools to help businesses avoid patent pitfalls abroad, achieve cost-effective protection, and support steady international growth.
I. What Is Overseas Patent Strategy? Core Value
1.1 Nature and Definition
Overseas patent strategy refers to companies securing patent protection in target countries through applications, acquisitions, or licensing. It’s not just technical export—it’s a systematic approach aligned with market demands, legal rules, and internal capabilities.
For instance, DJI’s overseas patent layout in the drone sector covers over 200 countries, preventing technology imitation and blocking competitors from mainstream markets through litigation, enabling DJI to capture over 70% of global market share.
1.2 Why Overseas Patent Strategy Is Essential
- • Avoid Forced Market Exit: A solar company was sued in Germany due to a lack of local patents and forced to recall products, losing over 50 million RMB.
- • Increase Negotiation Leverage: A car manufacturer saved $30 million annually in license fees by cross-licensing 200 overseas patents.
- • Boost Brand Value: Overseas patents signal strong technical capabilities to global clients. An electronics company secured Apple supply chain deals thanks to robust patent coverage.
- • Access Government Subsidies: Eligible companies can apply for up to 50% reimbursement on overseas filing costs.
II. Key Considerations for Overseas Patent Strategy
2.1 Market Types and Strategy
| Market Type | Characteristics | Strategy Focus |
| Emerging (e.g., Vietnam) | Low competition, weak protection | Core invention patents + industrial designs |
| Competitive (e.g., Germany) | Tech-intensive, high litigation | Full-chain patent coverage + portfolios |
| Monopoly (e.g., U.S. chips) | Dominated by giants | Niche technology breakthroughs + licensing |
Example: A home appliance company focused on compressor patents in Southeast Asia (emerging market), saving 60% of layout costs, while establishing a full portfolio in Europe (competitive market).
2.2 Adapting to Legal Environments
- • USA: Understand the shift from “first-to-invent” to “first-to-file”; claims must be drafted precisely.
- • Europe: Flexible divisional application system—split core technologies into multiple patents for broader protection.
- • Japan: Utility patents require no substantive examination—grant in 6 months, ideal for quick protection.
- • India: Long examination (4–5 years); consider parallel trademark and copyright protection.
2.3 Internal Resource Alignment
- • Human Resources: Form a 3-person team (tech + legal + market). SMEs may hire external consultants (~¥50,000/year).
- • Budgeting: Recommend 1.5–2% of overseas revenue. Prioritize markets with sales >¥100 million.
- • Time Management: Expect 18–36 months from filing to protection. Plan product launch timelines accordingly.
III. Core Strategies for Patent Layout
3.1 Technology Strategy: Build Three-Layer Protection
- 1. Core Layer: Proprietary breakthrough technologies (e.g., Huawei’s 5G coding), 100% invention patents.
- 2. Peripheral Layer: Improvements around core tech—apply for utility or design patents.
- 3. Defensive Layer: Preemptive filings on tech likely to be circumvented by competitors.
Example: A battery company patented solid-state materials (core), charging circuits (peripheral), and alternative anode materials (defensive).
3.2 Timing Strategy: Key Milestones
- • R&D Stage: File patent right after prototype completion (1–2 years before launch).
- • 6 Months Before Market Entry: Finish patent filings in target markets to avoid unprotected launches.
- • Within 3 Months After Competitor Activity: File design-around patents in response to new competitor filings.
3.3 Geographic Strategy: Follow the “3+X” Principle
- • “3”: U.S., Europe, and Japan—mature markets with 70% of high-end demand.
- • “X”: 2–3 growth markets (e.g., Southeast Asia, South America), adjusted by business growth.
Example: A smartphone brand saved ¥2 million annually by flexibly adjusting emerging market filings while maintaining coverage in major markets.
IV. Patent Strategy Execution Phases
4.1 Planning Phase: Four-Step Roadmap
- 1. Analyze global business goals (e.g., “15% EU market share in 3 years”).
- 2. Study competitor patent maps (use tools like PatSnap to find gaps).
- 3. Evaluate internal tech reserves (prioritize patentable elements).
- 4. Draft roadmap by country, patent type, and quantity.
4.2 Execution Phase: Five Acquisition Channels
- • Self-Application: Use PCT to file in 150+ countries. Start with Chinese-language filing.
- • Patent Acquisition: Buy local patents. One energy firm spent $20M on U.S. patents to enter the market quickly.
- • Cross-Licensing: Exchange usage rights with peers. A semiconductor firm used this to enter Korea.
- • Patent Pools: Join groups like the DVD pool to access essential patents.
- • Commissioned Development: Co-develop tech with overseas labs and assign patent ownership.
V. Costs and Insurance in Overseas Strategy
5.1 Detailed Cost Breakdown
| Item | U.S. (Invention) | EU (Invention) | Southeast Asia (Invention) |
| Filing Fee | $8,000 | €6,000 | $3,000 |
| Agency Fee | $12,000 | €10,000 | $5,000 |
| Annual Fees (10 yrs) | $15,000 | €12,000 | $8,000 |
| Total | $35,000 | €28,000 | $16,000 |
5.2 Cost-Saving Tips
- • Use PCT’s 18-month international phase to delay costly national entry.
- • Apply for government subsidies (e.g., Jiangsu offers ¥30,000/PCT case).
- • Drop low-value countries (e.g., in Africa) and use trade secrets instead.
5.3 Patent Insurance for Overseas Strategy
- • Coverage: Application rejection, litigation loss, etc.—up to 80% compensation.
- • Premium: 5–8% of total layout costs (e.g., ¥5–8 million layout → ¥250–400k premium).
- • Best For: First-time overseas filers or high-risk markets.
Example: A lighting company claimed $120,000 after a U.S. application was rejected.
VI. Three Key Traits of Overseas Strategy
6.1 Systematic Approach
Patent coverage should span the entire product lifecycle. A medical device company also patented usage methods and repair techniques beyond the product itself.
6.2 Dynamic Adjustment
Review layout quarterly. A consumer electronics brand shifted investment from India to Brazil after market evaluation.
6.3 Market Specificity
Tailor strategy by region—emphasize quality in Germany, focus on quantity in India.
VII. FAQs
- 1. How much does an overseas patent cost?
U.S. invention patent (10 years): ~$35,000. Europe: ~€28,000. Southeast Asia: ~$16,000. PCT filing in 10 countries: ¥500k–800k. Government subsidies may reduce this. - 2. What are the 3 characteristics of a good strategy?
Systematic (full-chain), dynamic (adaptive), and targeted (localized). - 3. How can SMEs lay out patents cost-effectively?
Use a “focus strategy”: target 1–2 key markets, use PCT to reduce upfront cost, prioritize invention patents, skip unnecessary peripheral patents. One sensor firm completed its U.S. layout for ¥500k. - 4. What are the key differences between overseas and domestic patents?
Review standards (U.S. demands higher inventiveness), protection periods (some extensions abroad), maintenance costs (higher in the West), litigation risks (e.g., U.S. ITC takes 18 months). - 5. How to choose a foreign patent agent?
Check three factors: local office presence (e.g., U.S. branch), China enterprise experience (5
About Us
MeritsIP: Your Global Intellectual Property Partner
At MeritsIP, we provide comprehensive IP services in biomedicine, medical devices, manufacturing, semiconductors, and AI. We support 200+ top clients globally with strategic, high-quality IP services.
Stay Connected
- Website: https://www.meritsipglobal.com
- LinkedIn: Follow us on LinkedIn
- Email: info@meritsip.com
